
Intersecting Dreams by Linda Edmister
Series: Book 2 in Edmister’s Intersections series
Publisher: Mister Ed Books (November 7, 2025)
REVIEW BY PRISCILLA BETTIS
When I first heard of this book, contemporary issues like progressive sex ed in the classroom and a growing Muslim population in the Western world piqued my interest. Add a young woman, Rose, looking for romance, and her humorous grandmother, Gert, not to mention a Kansas storm, and I was all in. Unfortunately, I didn’t enjoy the book. But maybe you will.
First, the author wrote chapters in omniscient, distant narration. That’s fine if you like classics by authors such as Stephen Crane or Edith Wharton. (Personally, I love Edith Wharton’s work.) There were passages like this one in which Rose sees more clearly the handsome object of her affections:
On what should have been a languorous day of innocent dalliance filled with sunshine and light flirtation, the hero of her dreams toppled headlong from his pedestal when he was unmasked as a lying undercover private investigator.
-Linda Edmister, Intersecting Dreams
But there were other scenes, action scenes, which resembled contemporary thrillers with passages like:
A punishing uppercut sent [him] flying through the air. He scrambled to his feet and rushed at his assailant, the lantern beam capturing the sheen from a knife blade.
-Linda Edmister, Intersecting Dreams (edited slightly to avoid spoilers)
The inconsistent writing style threw me out of my reading. Then again, a good plot can trump all sorts of mismatches between reading and writing styles. Except that the villain who drew so much of my attention and created so much danger for the characters disappeared in the first quarter of the story. I expected him to lurk in the background throughout the middle of the book and reappear at the climax, but he was gone gone and took the story’s suspense with him.
Just an aside: Animal lovers may need a trigger warning for this book.
Still, Rose was a sweet character (though she got a little shallow for my tastes concerning a certain wedding and her friend Amy’s makeover), and Tim, the man restoring an old homestead, was a capable, warmhearted character. Together Rose and Tim illuminated the themes of forgiveness and of sticking to God’s way instead of thinking our ways are better even when, or maybe especially when, it comes to romance.
Overall, this was not my type of book, but if you enjoy sweet characters and humorous grandmothers, this may be your type of book. Intersecting Dreams gets three good-but-not-great fish from me.

I received an e-copy of Intersecting Dreams from the author for review.
Thank you for sharing this honest review, dear Priscilla
LikeLiked by 1 person
And thank you for reading my review and commenting, Luisa.❤
LikeLike
You are so very welcome my dear Priscilla!
It is always my pleasure ❣️
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s a great review, Priscilla, and a fair one. It doesn’t sound like my kind of read either.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Olga. Well, maybe somebody else will like it more than I did. Have a super rest of your week!❤
LikeLike
Great review, Priscilla, and thanks for the many insights, but this book is not for me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Grant. Although it’s not the right book for either you or me, maybe someone else will like it. Have a fab rest of your week!🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I loved the title treatment on the cover, and while I do have a fondness for funny grandmothers, I don’t think this one is for me. Thanks for the candid review, Priscilla.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, isn’t the cover great? Thanks for reading my review, Staci. I hope you have a splendid rest of your week!❤
LikeLiked by 1 person
You too!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for your honest review, Priscilla. I, too, love Edith Wharton. I even love Stephen Crane. But I think a contemporary romance is not the place for that narration style. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good point, Nicole. Thanks for reading my review and commenting.❤
LikeLiked by 1 person
What a great review. I rarely even attempt to review a book I am meh about. You did it even-handedly, discussing both sides.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you, Jacqui. I just wish I liked it more than I did. Have a fabulous rest of your day!❤
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Priscilla, I don’t think this book is for me. Thanks for the review.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There were elements I liked, but yeah, it wasn’t really the book for me, either. Have a great rest of your week, Robbie, and thanks for commenting.❤
LikeLike
💓
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting change in writing style. In all honesty, the first one you included would have me closing the book. I no longer have the patience for the more classic writing. It does sound like the book does have some good scenes, but I’ll pass. Thank you for another informative review.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for reading my review, Marie. Yeah, too bad the book just doesn’t work, at least not for me. I hope you’re having a good week!
LikeLike
Too bad the story didn’t come together for you Priscilla. Thanks for sharing this review.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Denise. I’m glad I read it, but yeah, I wish it had been a better fit for me. Have a super rest of your week!❤
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry it didn’t work for you, Priscilla. Thanks for the TW about pets – that’s one I steer clear of.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, I was surprised in a romance or a Christian romantic suspense to have a certain animal scene. Thanks for reading my review, Teri. I hope you have a great rest of your week! ❤
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow, that cover is awesome! Too bad the same awesomeness didn’t carry over to the story inside. Omniscient POV wouldn’t be a problem for me, but the trigger warning about an animal scene has me steering clear.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Mae! Yeah, that animal thing. I think a lot of readers would say it doesn’t belong in this book. I agree with you on the cover. It’s both beautiful and clever. Have a super rest of your week, and thanks for commenting!❤
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great review, Priscilla. Interesting that the villain was only in it for the first quarter (unusual). I prefer close 3rd person POV myself. I’m fine with omniscient but I like a consistent style!! I don’t read romances, so this wouldn’t be for me, but it was interesting to read about it! Thanks for sharing!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Valinora! Yeah, that was interesting about the villain. Heh-heh, he was such a devious, tenacious villain, too! Thanks for your comment, and have a wonderful rest of your week!❤
LikeLiked by 1 person
What a unique way to place the title on the book cover, Priscilla. Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this book. Too bad there were inconsistencies.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Jan! I agree with you about the book title on the cover. Very clever. It wasn’t the right book for me, but no author hits it out of the park every time. Thanks for reading my review and commenting.❤
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the chuckle over the author’s inconsistent style, Priscilla! It definitely seems like she wasn’t sure which genre she wanted to write. I’ve heard other writers say this sometimes happens when they’re reading different genres while they are writing, so maybe that rings true here. I appreciated your examples. They really illustrated the mismatch in tone and style.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi KC! Edmister’s sweet and humorous characters almost made up for the inconsistent writing style. Although I didn’t enjoy the book, maybe other readers will. Have a great weekend, KC!❤
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fun review, Priscilla.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Pat! I wish I liked the book more, but not every book is going to be a good fit for every reader. Thanks for commenting.❤
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree about the title placement. Very clever. I’m not a fan of omniscient POV, but some folks really love it. It’s true, not every book is for every reader. I hope this one finds its audience.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I hope Intersecting Dreams finds the right audience too. Thanks for commenting, Kelly, and have a super rest of your weekend!❤
LikeLiked by 1 person